July 30, 1998
Downe may OK relocation
Sierra Club's May
wants Sydney residents moved now
By DAVID JACKSON *with Tera Camus, Cape Breton Bureau
Staff reporter
Sydney residents
living near Canada's "largest industrial slum" will be moved if scientific
tests show their health is at risk, Environment Minister Don Downe said
Wednesday.
"When it's
proven that there's a problem here and the safety of the people is at risk,
then we'll deal with it immediately," he said at a state-of the environment
news conference in Halifax.
"We won't
need to be hit in the head 14 times to move the people."
Residents
of Frederick Street discovered in June an arsenic-laced yellow ooze seeping
out of a rail bed into a brook, part of the that
runs through some of their backyards.
They live
only about 50 metres from Sysco's old coke ovens and Muggah Creek's toxic
tar ponds.
Environment
Canada tests have confirmed unacceptable levels of several toxins, including
arsenic, in the area.
But Dr. Jeff
Scott, the chief medical officer for the province, said the residents weren't
at risk based on those results.
More tests
are underway. Dr. Scott is examining residents' hair samples for
arsenic and blood samples for iron.
The federal
and provincial health departments are doing more tests, and Nova Scotia's
Department of Transportation and public Works is analyzing its tests of
soil, water and air quality in the area.
Mr. Downe
said he wants to have hard scientific facts in front of him before acting.
He said he expects the test results in the next few weeks and that will
decide whether residents will be relocated.
Elizabeth
May of the Sierra Club, an environmental group, commended the minister
for saying moving people is distinctly possible.
But she said
she didn't understand why he needed more tests.
"Here we have
a whole neighborhood that has 13 times to 18.5 times the legally set guidelines
for arsenic. I really don't think there's a real big issue here,"
she said in an interview in Sydney.
Mr. Downe
said the tar ponds pollution is a national, not just provincial issue,
and the federal government should take the lead in finding a solution.
Science to decide if residents move
Environment minister awaiting test results from Frederick
Street
BY LISA MANNINGER
Cape Breton Post & CP
HALIFAX -
Residents of Frederick Street will be moved if tests indicate their health
is at risk, Nova Scotia's environment minister said Wednesday.
"We won't
need to be hit in the head 14 times to move the people," Don Downe said,
adding the decision will be based on science rather than emotion.
Downe made
the comment when he unveiled the province's first ever State of the Environment
Report at the Nova Scotia Museum of Natural History.
Residents
of the Whitney Pier street discovered in June an arsenic-laced yellow ooze
seeping out of a rail bed into a brook, part of the
that runs through some of their backyards.
They live
only about 50 metres from Sydney Steel's old coke ovens and Muggah Creek's
toxic tar ponds.
Environment
Canada tests have confirmed unacceptable levels of several toxins, including
arsenic, in the area.
Down said
he wants to have hard scientific facts before acting.
The federal
and provincial Health Departments are doing more tests, and Nova Scotia's
Department of Transportation and Public Works is analyzing its tests of
soil, water and air quality.
He said he
expects the test results in the next few weeks.
Downe told
his audience the province has made progress in the areas of air quality,
water resources and solid waste management but has work to do in several
key areas.
The most obvious
problem area is the Sydney tar ponds. He called the tar ponds "the
nation's largest industrial slum" but said the process set up to deal with
the most toxic contaminated site in eastern Canada is promising.
The State
of the Environment Report calls the tar ponds "the largest chemical waste
site in the nation," containing 700,000 cubic meters of sediment contaminated
with polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and about 45,000 tonnes or
sediment contaminated with polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs).
"The tar ponds
are also the site of numerous untreated residential and industrial sewer
outfalls," the report states.
Downe said
sewage collection and site clean up are two of the preliminary steps in
the remediation process that have already begun.
He stressed
the tar ponds are a national issue and the federal government has taken
the lead in the process to consult the community and find a solution to
the environmental problem that is economically viable.
Downe called
the State of the Environment report a milestone because it is "a fundamental
first step in assessing where we are in the province from an environmental
stand point."
The report
was the first in a series of planned reports to provide a picture of the
environmental health of Nova Scotia
Downe would
not say whether or not the province received a passing grade in the report
but did say Nova Scotia is "moving in the right direction" and "better
today than it was."
As evidence
of the province's improving environmental lot the report states: "Air quality
for common air pollutants has consistently been within the 'Acceptable'
range and frequently achieves the 'Desirable' range in most regions..."
Port Hawkesbury
is the only area of the province where local emissions periodically cause
air quality exceedence.
"There pulp
and paper processing and electrical generation at Point Tupper occasionally
contribute to levels above acceptable standards for sulfur dioxide," the
report states.
All other
air quality problems in Nova Scotia are caused by ground level ozone generated
primarily outside of the region. Downe said more work needs to be
done to forge stronger air quality agreements with industrial centres in
the US and central Canada.
Nova Scotia
seems to have made the greatest environmental strides in the area of waste
resource management. In 1989 the province was among the highest per
capita producers of garbage anywhere in teh world. The province now
diverts 28 or 29 percent of its solid waste from landfills and aims to
divert 50 percent of all solid waste by the year 2000.
"We will be,
I understand, the only province in all of Canada which will be able to
meet that target by the year 2000," Downe explained.
The number
of landfill sites in Nova Scotia has been reduced to 19, down from 44 in
1995, and by 2005 the number of disposal sites will be further reduced
to between seven and 10.
Downe said
the quality of water in Nova Scotia has shown marked improvement and regular
tests show drinking water is free from bacteria more than 90 percent of
the time.
Sewage treatment
however, is a future challenge that faces the government, even though the
costs will be staggering.
"We know that
continuing the discharge untreated sewage into marine water can no longer
be acceptable in the 1990s," Downe explained.
The State
of the Environment report is billed as a snapshot of the environment that
will establish a baseline to measure future trends against.
Next
Article
Contact
Muggah Creek