September 7, 1997
The site, covered with synthetic materials, clay and dirt, has arsenic concentrations more than 300 times the accepted residential level
From the arched drive-through
of the $2 million library under construction, Gilda Stanbery-Cotney can
just see the top of the fenced, green mound behind the tire store across
Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard.
"I sincerely have faith, even if it takes divine
intervention, that they will not allow this to stay," said Stanbery-Cotney,
the city’s librarian. "it’s a constant reminder of a constant threat."
The mound, just under an acre in size, is where
Canadyne-Georgia Corp. dumped the worst of the toxic contamination more
than a decade ago when it began cleaning up the old Woolfolk pesticide
plant. The site is in the middle of Fort Valley, a predominantly black,
middle Georgia town of 8,000.
Covered with synthetic materials, clay and dirt,
the mound, or "cap" as it is called by residents, has arsenic concentrations
more than 300 times the accepted residential level. In addition to the
library, its immediate neighborhood includes a school for mentally impaired
adults, a sports complex and dozens of small cinder-block homes.
Since 1990, the Woolfolk plant has been a federal
Superfund site, part of the 16-year old program enacted by Congress to
clean up the nation’s worst hazardous waste dumps.
Undisturbed during those seven years, the cap
became a rallying point when the Environmental Protection Agency this summer
finally proposed its cleanup plan: leaving the cap in place and monitoring
it to be sure pollutants don’t leach into the city’s groundwater.
Black leaders call it environmental racism, and
white business and government officials oppose it on economic grounds.
"Everything EPA did was designed to control the
costs of this program for this company, without regard to the needs of
this town," said Marvin Crafter, a city councilman and leader in the black
community.
"It’s totally unacceptable to leave that cap
there," said Jeff Holly, a white businessman and city councilman. "Realtors
in surrounding cities are using that as a tool against our community."
The cap and Fort Valley’s seven-year odyssey
as a Superfund site illustrate many of the problems that have plagued the
Superfund program and made it impossible, despite five years of trying,
for Congress to rewrite the law.
House Speaker Newt Gingrich said last month he
wants to make another attempt this fall to revamp the Superfund program,
but few observers believe that even the recent outbreak of bipartisanship
in Congress can lead to an agreement.
"What the law does is drive up the cost of the
cleanup, create a lot of divisions between the community, the regulatory
agency and the company, and it lengthens the process by ;years," said Michael
J. Kowalski, president of Canadyne-Georgia, which bought the Woolfolk plant
in 1978.
Kowalski said his company already has spent $10
million on the Woofolk cleanup and likely will spend another $10 million
before the process is completed, now projected for 2003.
Much of that spending was done prior to 1990,
when the site was added to the National Priority List of the nation’s worst
toxic waste dumps. By then, Canadyne-Georgia had demolished and removed
several old buildings, trucked out 3,700 cubic yards of the most contaminated
soil, and built the cap.
Kowalski said Canadyne-Georgia is prepared to
implement the final cleanup plan EPA proposed – if the agency ratifies
the proposal when it completes its review of public comment and issues
its record of decision later this month.
The federal agency that monitors the health effects
of superfund cleanups, the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
(ATSDR), has urged removal of the cap. That recommendation is based on
fears that arsenic concentrations underneath the cap will leach into the
aquifer that supplies the town’s water.
Already, two of the town’s five wells have been
shut down because of low-levels of contamination from a different chemical
that scientists say may have come from the Woolfolk site.
John Crellin, an environmental health scientist
at ATSDR, said evaluations of some 50 people who lived around the site
for years are suffering from skin lesions could not rule out the possibility
that they were caused by arsenic exposure. Further studies are under way.
Return
to Muggah Creek